Maria Valtorta Readers' Group, March 2025 (Updated 8/1/25)
Dear Maria Valtorta Readers Worldwide,This is our summary response to the February 2025 Vatican press release concerning the writings of Maria Valtorta. For a full analysis, including theological and historical context, please see our comprehensive article titled A Comprehensive Analysis of the Vatican's February 2025 Press Release on Maria Valtorta's Writings, where we address the key points of a faithful Catholic response in detail, leaving no stone unturned.
Additionally, you can view our discussion of this topic in a podcast episode which aired on March 11, 2025, here: Discerning the Truth: The Maria Valtorta Readers' Group Responds to the Vatican's 2025 Press Release
On February 22, 2025, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) issued a press release concerning the writings of Maria Valtorta. This marks the first time since 1992 that the Vatican has made a statement on the matter. Back then, Bishop Dionigi Tettamanzi, Secretary of the Italian Episcopal Conference, authorized the continued publication of Valtorta's works for the "true good of readers and in the spirit of genuine service to the faith of the Church" (Pro e contro Maria Valtorta, 5th edition, Centro Editoriale Valtortiano, 2008, pp. 263-5).
On a positive note, the statement neither condemns Maria Valtorta's work nor affirms any errors of faith or morals within it. It implicitly supports the right of Catholics to read her writings, echoing the position expressed by Bishop Tettamanzi 33 years ago. However, the statement attempts to humanize the origin of the work, which may risk undermining the trust that faithful Catholics place in the profound truths and detailed teachings contained in these writings.
The English version of the February 22, 2025 Vatican statement is reproduced below:1
The Holy See frequently receives requests from both clergy and laity for a clarification about the Church's position on the writings of Maria Valtorta, such as her work, Il poema dell'Uomo Dio (The Poem of the Man-God), now known by the title, L'Evangelo come mi è stato rivelato (The Gospel as Revealed to Me), and other publications.
It should be reiterated that alleged "visions", "revelations," and "messages" contained in the writings of Maria Valtorta—or, in any case, attributed to them—cannot be regarded as having a supernatural origin. Rather, they should be considered simply as literary forms that the author used to narrate the life of Jesus Christ in her own way.
In its long tradition, the Church does not accept as normative the Apocryphal Gospels and other similar texts since it does not recognize them as divinely inspired. Instead, the Church refers back to the sure reading of the inspired Gospels.
Vatican City, February 22, 2025
1. French Valtorta scholar François-Michel Debroise, in response to a critic of Maria Valtorta, writes:
When Maillard, on his YouTube account, declares Maria Valtorta "condemned" in connection with the Dicastery's statement (February 22, 2025), he is making an interpretative reading. If the Dicastery had intended to say that Maria Valtorta's work was not of divine origin, it would have stated so as clearly as possible by using the official explicit formula: "constat de non supernaturalitate." There are examples of this on the Dicastery's website. [See note 1 below] This is not the case with the statement in question. Similarly, there is no reference to a diocesan inquiry, even though this is required by law. For our part, we have explained and justified that this is an appeal to the "prudential reading of human faith," which is both a right and an ancient practice for all private revelations, even those "recognized" by the Magisterium (see Cardinal Lambertini, Pius X, Cardinal Ratzinger). [See note 2 below]
Note 1: For example: The case of Mrs. Gisella Cardia, one of the two cases judged negatively according to the new norms, explicitly indicates the final judgment as "constat de non supernaturalitate" and references the bishop's judgment. These elements are completely absent from the statement regarding Maria Valtorta.
Note 2: Cardinal Ratzinger recalls this principle in his theological commentary on the Secret of Fatima (last part of the document). St. Pius X expressed it in his encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907), section 75.
2. It recommends that Maria Valtorta's primary work should be regarded as a novel.
3. While it does not explicitly label Maria Valtorta's writings as apocryphal, it subtly attempts to categorize them as such, which is incorrect.
4. It recommends Catholics to prioritize reading the canonical Gospels over apocryphal literature, yet fails to address the vast tradition of Catholic mystical writings, into which Maria Valtorta's work more appropriately falls, as opposed to the category of "apocryphal" writings.
Addressing the points above in order:
1. For Catholics, this brings to mind the time when the Holy Office declared that (later Saint) Padre Pio's stigmata and other apparent miracles "could not be considered of supernatural origin." In the 1920s, the Holy Office issued five decrees and censures against him and stripped him of most of his priestly functions. Needless to say, these judgments were later proven to be incorrect and were reversed. Pope Pius XI, who lifted the ban on Padre Pio, remarked, "I have not been badly disposed toward Padre Pio, but I have been badly informed." Padre Pio has since been canonized.
He was treated far more harshly than Maria Valtorta, as the Vatican has never made any negative statements about the well-established reputation of holiness of Valtorta. In fact, several Popes have shown favor toward her work, including Pope Pius XII, who ordered the publication of her writings, and Pope Paul VI, who sent a letter of congratulations and blessing (N. 250075) to world-renowned mariologist Fr. Gabriel Roschini, O.S.M., for his 395-page mariological study of Valtorta's writings, which he had submitted to the Holy Father. In fact, Archbishop Pasquale Macchi, Private Secretary to Pope Paul VI, told Fr. Corrado M. Berti, O.S.M., during an hour-long interview in 1963: "When His Holiness (Paul VI) was Archbishop of Milan, he read one of the books of The Poem of the Man-God. He told me how much he appreciated it and had me send the complete work to the library of the diocesan seminary."2 If one were to adopt the latest viewpoint of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), it would suggest that the pontiff made a poor judgment in reading and promoting Valtorta's work, and that he should have focused exclusively on the canonical Gospels instead. It seems the DDF presumes to know better than both Pope Pius XII and Pope Paul VI, who both encouraged others to read it. A similar situation occurred during Pope Pius XII's reign. Also see how Pope Pius XII defended Maria Valtorta's writings against certain members of the Holy Office in the 1940s.
In more recent times, even Pope Francis wrote an explicit letter of encouragement to the Maria Valtorta Foundation in Viareggio, stating: "I encourage you to continue with the same commitment your mission of making Maria Valtorta's life and literary work known, especially all that it can offer for the good of the Church and society. Onward!"
The February 22, 2025, press release from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith regarding Maria Valtorta’s writings is not part of the Ordinary Magisterium. It is a disciplinary clarification, not a formal teaching on faith or morals. It does not carry the authoritative weight of magisterial documents like encyclicals or catechetical texts. It's fallible, and we hold that the DDF's statement that Maria Valtorta's work "cannot be considered of supernatural origin" is not only incorrect, but also absurd, given the overwhelming evidence of its supernatural nature. We place this erroneous judgment by the DDF in the same category as other historical mistakes made by this office:
• The erroneous declaration that Saint Padre Pio's stigmata was "not of supernatural origin," along with the multiple censures of him.
• The initial placement of St. Faustina Kowalska's writings on the Index of Forbidden Books by the Holy Office, a decision later reversed with her canonization.
• The condemnation of the works of St. Thomas Aquinas on January 18, 1277, which was eventually annulled.
• Venerable Mary of Agreda's Mystical City of God, which was examined for fourteen years, placed on the Index of Forbidden Books for three months, then vindicated by Pope Clement XI, who issued two decrees strictly prohibiting its future inclusion on the Index. In the past century, two Popes affirmed her work, even extending Apostolic Blessings to its readers and promoters—an action far removed from the earlier judgment of the Hierarchy, which had placed it on the Index.
• During the pontificate of Pope Leo XIII, the Index of Forbidden Books was revised, and approximately one thousand books were removed, highlighting the fluidity of some of these judgments.
Dr. Miravalle recognizes a deficiency in the Norms for Proceeding in the Discernment of Alleged Supernatural Phenomena, issued by the Vatican on May 17, 2024. He believes that these norms do not serve the Church in the best possible way. He continues in his video regarding the February 2025 DDF statement on Maria Valtorta's writings, stating, "It should be obeyed. What that means is that we are not to present The Poem of the Man-God or the writings of Maria Valtorta as if they are presently under a category of supernatural approval by the DDF. That of course is a discipline that could change next week theoretically. I wouldn't hold your breath [that it will change as soon as next week], but that's the nature of a discipline: disciplines can change." (2:09 through 3:41)
Later in the video, he says, "We should always obey the Church's discipline. In this case the DDF has come out and said this is not supernatural. Now what does obedience mean? It means we do not publicly present The Poem as if it's anything but what the DDF says at this point. So if we go around saying, 'The DDF says it's supernatural,' this is obviously disobedience. We got to grant what the DDF has stated and we should not pass on or promulgate The Poem as if it were dictated/determined/confirmed as supernatural. Does that mean that one can personally retain a faith on a private level in the supernatural character of it? Of course! The Church doesn't dictate that. We can certainly personally believe that The Poem is of a supernatural origin." (22:43 through 23:50) Again later he emphasizes that personal beliefs about the supernatural origin of The Poem may be retained, "We can personally continue, as I will personally continue, to believe in the supernatural character of The Poem of the Man-God". (24:28 through 24:35) He also affirms: "It's very clear that the statement of the DDF does not prohibit reading The Poem." (25:40 through 25:45)
As the Maria Valtorta Readers' Group, we obey the DDF statement, while retaining our personal belief in the supernatural character of Maria Valtorta's writings. We do not present The Poem of the Man-God or the writings of Maria Valtorta as if they are presently under the category of a supernatural approval by the DDF, nor have we ever done so. We affirm that the DDF has not classified these writings as supernatural, but we hold our personal conviction that they are, indeed, of supernatural origin. We affirm other Catholics are permitted to hold that opinion as well.
The Maria Valtorta Readers' Group has never publicly claimed that the Vatican has declared her writings to be of supernatural origin. There is no evidence of a formal Vatican investigation that would support such a declaration. Thus, the matter remains one of personal discernment. Furthermore, under the new norms, the Vatican has excluded the possibility of any private revelation being affirmed as supernatural except in exceptional circumstances.
Therefore, the Maria Valtorta Readers' Group:
1. Personally believes in the supernatural origin of Maria Valtorta's writings.
2. Affirms the right of other Catholics to personally believe in the supernatural origin of her writings.
3. Publicly acknowledges the DDF statement which says they do not consider it supernatural in origin, though we respectfully disagree with it, considering it an error.
2. There is compelling evidence that Maria Valtorta's work is far more than just a novel. This evidence spans across theological, spiritual, literary, and scientific fields, as well as the immense good it has brought to countless souls. When examined with honesty, it becomes clear that the work cannot simply be attributed to the literary imaginings of a human being, particularly considering the breadth of expertise Valtorta lacked and her severely compromised physical condition at the time of writing. For further details, please refer to the following sub-chapters in our free e-book, which provide information on scientific evidence supporting Maria Valtorta's claim of supernatural inspiration:
• Proof by Astronomy (Such as Detailed Astronomic Observations Over the Course of Hundreds of Pages in Her 1940s Visions that a Purdue University Professor of Theoretical Physics Testified Are Remarkably Consistent with Her Dating System and that She Could Not Have Predicted or Verified Without a Computer)
• Proof by Geography and Topography and Archaeology (Including Her Describing Palestine and Over 350 Geographical Locations in the Holy Land with a Level of Precision in Multiple Fields that She Could Not Possibly Have Known Without Modern Electronic Scholastic Resources or Access to an Extensive Collection of Books/Atlases in the 1940s that Eyewitnesses and Common Sense Confirm She Did Not—Nor Could Have Had—Access to and Which Itself Arguably Would Have Been Insufficient to Complete Her Work)
• Proof by its Knowledge, Depth, and Eminence in the Theological, Exegetical, Mystical, and Mariological Fields (Which Many World-Renowned Trustworthy Theologians Say Exceed Anything They Have Ever Read)
• Proof by Her Detailed, Exact, and Often Unparalleled Knowledge of the Political, Religious, Economic, Social, and Familial Situation—as Well as the Dress—of the Ancient Jewish, Samaritan, and Roman Peoples that Astound Even World-Renowned Biblical Scholars
• Proof by The Poem's Unquestionable Expertise, Deep Knowledge, and Exhaustive Information in Such a Wide Variety of Theological and Scientific Subjects, and the Fact Almost 15,000 Handwritten Pages of Such Was Written in Only 3½ Years Amidst Her Unusually Severe Physical Condition and Illnesses and Even Though She Lacked the Learning, Resources, and Books Required to Write a Work a Tenth as Profound as This
• Proof by the Extraordinary, Unprecedented Way in Which it Was Written, Compiled, & Put Together (Such as the Fact that 166 Out of the 647 Chapters Were Written Out of Order, and She has Jesus Ministering in Over 350 Named Locations and Traveling Over 4,000 Miles in Six Different Cycles Across Palestine, and Yet Jesus and All of the Other 500+ Characters are Never in a Place Inconsistent with Either the Story Line or the Timing and Distance Necessities Required for Traveling, and There is Not One Person, Place, or Thing Out of Place)
• Proof By the Writing's Extraordinary Purity, Holiness, Loftiness, and Eminence Among the Writings that Exist in the World
• Proof (or a Substantiating Factor) by Research that Shows that The Poem is Not Based on (or a Mere Expansion of) any Known Gospel Manuscript Standard, Version, or School of Critical Thought, Something Expected if a Work of This Magnitude, Detail, and Accuracy Had Been a Mere Human Effort
• Proof (or a Substantiating Factor) in How The Poem Resolves Many Problems in the Gospel Accounts Which Scholars Have Struggled with For Years (Including Apparent Contradictions Between the Different Gospel Accounts and Apparent Errors or Inconsistencies Within the Same Gospel Account), and How It Furthermore Corrects Certain Misunderstandings and Translation Errors that Have Been Perpetuated Throughout the Centuries
• Proof (or a Substantiating Factor) by the Fact Maria Valtorta's Visions of Christ's Passion Perfectly Match Detailed Findings on the Miraculous Shroud of Turin that Recent Modern Scientific Tests Have Revealed Decades After Her Writings Were Published and the Fact Her Writings Foretold Something Amazing About the Veil of Veronica Which Has Been Scientifically Proven for the First Time Decades After Her Death
• Proof (or a Substantiating Factor) by its Perfect Correspondence to the Ancient Liturgical and Patristic Tradition of the Ancient Catholic Byzantine Rite of the Church
• Proof by the Testimony of Countless Trustworthy Clerics, Authorities, Experts, Scientists, and Pious Lay Faithful and the Tremendously Good Fruits Produced in Individuals and in the Church as a Whole
• The Valtorta Enigma: A Fictionalized Life of Jesus? by Jean-François Lavère (Official English Translation)
• Literary Fiction or Ancient Astronomical and Meteorological Observations in the Work of Maria Valtorta? published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Scienze e Ricerche (Science and Research)
• A Mathematical Analysis of Maria Valtorta's Mystical Writings published in the peer-reviewed journal Religions, published by the Swiss publisher MDPI
Furthermore, in an ironic twist of events, just 26 days before the DDF's statement on Maria Valtorta's writings, the Dicastery for the Causes of Saints declared Luigia Sinapi "Venerable." What makes this particularly relevant to the case of Maria Valtorta is Luigia's revelation of shocking corruption within the Holy Office. Certain individuals within the institution sought to undermine Pope Pius XII's support for Valtorta's writings through deceit, manipulation, and intimidation—culminating in a physical assault and an attempted rape against Luigia herself. She met with the Pope on several occasions to discuss the writings, which he wanted to see published. Luigia's unwavering persistence, combined with her close spiritual relationship with the Holy Father, played a pivotal role in exposing the internal conflicts that, tragically, after Pius XII's death, led to the tarnishing of the work's reputation and the indefinite delay of its formal Vatican endorsement. Read more here: Vatican Declares Luigia Sinapi Venerable in 2025: The Mystic Who Challenged the Holy Office's Opposition to Maria Valtorta's Work and Met with Pope Pius XII About Valtorta.
Supporting this testimony, newly leaked documents from the Vatican's 1940s dossier on Maria Valtorta reveal that her opponents within the Holy Office failed to engage her writings seriously or fairly, often relying on secondhand summaries and misinformation. This negligence significantly undermines the credibility of their criticisms, reinforces the case for a renewed, objective evaluation of her work, and casts serious doubt on the foundations of the recent statement issued by the DDF. However, given the level of corruption present within the Vatican in our time, we must honestly acknowledge that such a reevaluation may not be possible until God purifies His Church—an event foretold in numerous prophecies by approved Catholic mystics as a necessary precursor to true renewal within the Church.
3. The DDF statement attempts to categorize Valtorta's writings as apocryphal, a mischaracterization that could easily mislead people and is factually incorrect. The term "apocryphal" refers to ancient or early Christian writings that were excluded from the Old and New Testament canons during the formation of the biblical canon in the fourth century. The term is generally associated with writings from the early centuries of Christianity, not modern or contemporary works. Maria Valtorta's writings are private revelations, similar to other mystical works like Venerable Mary of Agreda's Mystical City of God, and should not be considered "apocryphal." St. Thomas Aquinas wrote: "God sends prophets to every generation, not to give a new doctrine, but to remind the faithful what they must do to save their souls" (Summa Theologica II-II, Q. 174, Art. 6). The prophets of every century are not "apocryphal." World-renowned biblical scholar, Blessed Gabriel Allegra, wrote that there is "immense distance that exists between The Poem and the New Testament Apocrypha."
4. Maria Valtorta reported Jesus said to her:3
"[…] For this reason, it is proper to specify that the inspired writer ‘has God as the author.' […] The work which is given to men through [Maria Valtorta] is not a canonical book. But it remains an inspired book, which I am giving to help you understand certain passages in the canonical books, and especially to comprehend what My time [on earth] as the Master was like, and to know Me: I, the Word, in My words. Neither I, nor especially the spokesman [Maria Valtorta] […] say the work would be a canonical book. In truth, however, I tell you that it is an inspired book, since the instrument is not capable of writing pages that she does not even understand unless I Myself explain them to her to take away her fear."
We live in a time when the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) is led by a newly appointed prelate who has publicly endorsed errors and heresy, contradicted the Church's perennial teachings on numerous occasions, and has been embroiled in moral scandals (refer to our full article for details). In this context, Catholics may justifiably question the motivations and recent conclusion of the DDF regarding Maria Valtorta's writings. As said earlier, while we disagree with the DDF's conclusion, we still obey and adhere to the discipline of not presenting Valtorta's writings as if they have received approval by the Vatican as coming from a supernatural source. Regarding the factual accuracy of the conclusions of the DDF statement, we maintain that well-informed Catholics, understanding that not all statements from the DDF are infallible, may rightfully doubt certain conclusions. If informed Catholics can present credible evidence that a statement is erroneous, they are not committing a sin by rejecting it. We do not reject the authority of the DDF, but rather we challenge the validity of the specific conclusion in this case, considering it to be an erroneous judgment.We agree that the canonical Gospels should be read, but we disagree with the DDF statement suggesting that Valtorta's writings should be neglected in favour of exclusively reading the canonical Gospels. Valtorta's works serve as an excellent complement to the canonical Gospels. Fr. Gabriel Roschini, O.S.M., was a world-renowned Mariologist, decorated professor and founder of the Marianum Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Rome, professor at the Lateran Pontifical University, and a Consultant to the Holy Office and the Sacred Congregation for the Causes of Saints. In Fr. Roschini’s book, The Virgin Mary in the Writings of Maria Valtorta (4th ed.; p. 16), he writes:
Private revelations are useful
Though they do not add and cannot add anything substantially new to public revelation (already complete in Christ), we should not regard private revelations as useless. In fact, they are very useful to the souls of those they are communicated to. In several ways: they nourish and develop the Church's faith and piety; they promote a greater intelligence of the truth and documents of public revelation. By means of private revelations, God helps us draw a greater profit from public revelation.
The Poem is presented as the completion and explanation of the Gospels… This explanation is justified in part by the words of St. John: "Many other prodigies Jesus did… which are not written in the present book" (Jn 20:30); and: "Many other things Jesus did which, if they had to be written one by one, I think that the whole world could not contain the books to be written" (Jn 21:25). It is a completion and explanation… since from the historical-theological point of view, Revelation was closed with the Apostles… and could at most be the fruit of a particular individual charism.
In summary, the Church has no need of this work to unfold her salvific mission… But the Church can tacitly or publicly recognize that certain private revelations can be useful for the knowledge and practice of the Gospel and for understanding its Mysteries, and hence, She can approve them in a negative form, that is, by declaring that the revelations are not contrary in word to the Faith… In this negative form, the revelations of St. Bridget, St. Matilda, St. Gertrude, Venerable Mary of Agreda, St. John Bosco… have been approved.
I hold that the work [of Valtorta] demands a supernatural origin… I think that it is the product of one or more charisma… It is the property of charisma that they are bestowed by the Spirit of Jesus for the good of the Church… I think that it comes from the Spirit of Jesus. Maria Valtorta's Poem of the Man-God has been published as a novel, but it is not a novel. It is the complement of the four Gospel traditions, and the explanation of them… I myself think that only through a charism of the Holy Spirit, solely with His help, could a poor sick woman of limited biblical culture write, in the space of three years, [10,000] pages which when printed are the equivalent of 10 volumes. And what pages!
I hold that this Work of Valtorta deserves at least that attention which theologians pay to the Mystical City of God of Venerable Agreda… No one could make me believe that a poor, sick woman has written The Poem solely in virtue of her fervent religious feeling. […] Having well determined the nature of the charism of the Spirit and the reality of His action in Maria Valtorta, what attitude ought the Christian to assume in reading these admirable evangelical pages? It seems to me that the same practical conclusion imposes itself for whoever has read and studied the documents of the History of the Apparitions of Paray le Monial, Lourdes, Fatima, Syracuse…. And with the same degree of faith, and in the measure which the Lord Jesus and the Church desire it, I believe in it.
• How must a Catholic demonstrate obedience to the February 22, 2025 statement by the DDF?
• Does the February 22, 2025 judgment/statement fall under the Church's protection of infallibility?
• Has there been historic precedent for the Holy Office/CDF/DDF making mistakes in such judgments?
• If the judgment expressed in the 2025 DDF statement does not fall under the Church's protection of infallibility, can it be factually incorrect?
• Can a Catholic have doubts about the judgment of the Holy Office/CDF/DDF?
• If a Catholic can have doubts about the judgment of the CDF/DDF under these circumstances, can a Catholic assess whether the judgment is correct or not? Should they?
• Is this a time in the Church where the DDF is led by prelates who publicly endorse errors and heresy and contradict the perennial teachings of the Church?
• In the case of the assessment of the supernatural character of Maria Valtorta's writings, would a Catholic have reason to doubt the judgment of the DDF?
• In assessing the supernatural character of Maria Valtorta's writings, should a Catholic doubt the judgment of the DDF?
• Given that the assessment of the supernatural character of Maria Valtorta's writings by the DDF is doubtful, how should a Catholic proceed with assessing the supernatural character of Maria Valtorta's writings?
• Have bishops, renowned Catholic theologians, prominent Catholic lay faithful, and even beatified or canonized Catholics publicly affirmed their belief in the supernatural character of Maria Valtorta's writings?
• Would it be a sin for a contemporary Catholic to affirm belief in the supernatural character of Maria Valtorta's writings, even after the February 22, 2025 statement by the DDF?
• Does the Maria Valtorta Readers' Group personally and/or publicly affirm belief in the supernatural character of Maria Valtorta's writings, even after the February 22, 2025 statement by the DDF?
• Is it possible for the statement of the DDF to be reversed?
• Isn't it strange to say faithful Catholics could doubt the conclusion of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith?
• What should the Catholic Church have done over the past half-century with regard to Maria Valtorta's writings?
• Have clerics of the Catholic Church received punishment from God as a result of rejecting and attempting to hinder the publication of Maria Valtorta's revelations?
1. Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Press Release Regarding the Writings of Maria Valtorta, February 22, 2025. Accessed March 5, 2025.
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20250222_comunicato-scritti-valtorta_en.html
Click Here to Jump Back to Footnote 1 in the Text
2. Berti, Rev. Corrado, O.S.M. A Testimony on Maria Valtorta's Poem of the Man-God. December 8, 1978.
https://web.archive.org/web/20221230035220/http://www.bardstown.com/~brchrys/Corberti.html
A photocopy of Fr. Berti's original signed Italian typescript is available for viewing and download at:
https://web.archive.org/web/20221230035232/http://www.bardstown.com/~brchrys/Testimony%20of%20Fr.%20Berti.pdf
Click Here to Jump Back to Footnote 2 in the Text
3. Valtorta, Maria. The Notebooks: 1945-1950. Centro Editoriale Valtortiano, January 28, 1947, pp. 335-37. ISBN-13: 9788879870887.
Click Here to Jump Back to Footnote 3 in the Text
